Under the influence.........(of a muse)
|This writing has been rated by 3 members, resulting in a rating of 91.933333333333% overall. Below is a breakdown of these results:|
|Spelling & Grammar:||90.333333333333%|
A muse, not amuse, although I think it's ironic that a word that means to cause to laugh is similar to the words that can mean a source of inspiration.
I've had muses. They seem to be few and far between, but does a muse have to be a person? Could it be a thing, a concept, a situation, a state of mind? My most productive moments, in the past, have been those spawned by boredom. I'm talking pen and paper productive, not work, obviously. In other words, boredom was my muse.
Can a muse be bad for us? I think this has been proven to be the case in most of the stories, the myths and legends. Muses can drive us to the brink of insanity and even push us over the edge. They can cloud our judgment and create outcomes that are less than desirable.
So why then would one seek a muse? Is it pure lack of inspiration otherwise? Do the divinities only smile down upon those that approach the arts with a muse at their side? Me thinks not.
But, whose to say that the work churned out with or without a muse is worth its weight, so to speak? Is the work done in the presence of a muse that much better? And if a muse is harmful or can be, is it worth it?
I propose these questions near the beginning of a streak of writing. At the moment I am grateful for my recently departed muse. I'm not sure how I'll be feeling as the inspiration wears off, as the influence dwindles. Until I know how long this streak will last or the quality of the work that is pouring out of me I can only speculate.
I'm thinking muses are bad. Or rather, muses are wonderfully inspiring and equally, devastatingly, destructive. This being my first foray into writings inspired by the manifestation of a muse in corporeal form, I will be taking notes (mental notes) I hate writing.